From squirrel@echelon.alias.net Thu Mar 18 18:50:06 1999
Path: newscene.newscene.com!novia!sunqbc.risq.qc.ca!newshub.northeast.verio.net!news.he.net!news.lava.net!anon.lcs.mit.edu!nym.alias.net!mail2news-x2!mail2news
Date: 19 Mar 1999 01:50:06 -0000
Subject: FZ BIBLE repost 14/35 SOLUTION TO ENTRAPMENT 9TH ACC
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology,alt.clearing.technology
From: Secret Squirrel <squirrel@echelon.alias.net>
Comments: Please report problems with this automated remailing service to
	<squirrel-admin@echelon.alias.net>. The message sender's identity
	is unknown, unlogged, and not replyable.
Message-ID: <3b2bf3f5891fcdcc5776607798028a32@anonymous.poster>
Mail-To-News-Contact: postmaster@nym.alias.net
Organization: mail2news@nym.alias.net
Lines: 1034
Xref: newscene.newscene.com alt.religion.scientology:691859 alt.clearing.technology:76519

FREEZONE BIBLE ASSOCIATION TECH POST

9th ACC - THE SOLUTION TO ENTRAPMENT CASSETTES 14/35

Our purpose is to promote religious freedom and the Scientology
Religion by spreading the Scientology Tech across the internet.

The Cof$ abusively suppresses the practice and use of
Scientology Tech by FreeZone Scientologists.  It misuses the
copyright laws as part of its suppression of religious freedom.

The writings of LRH form our Old Testament just as the writings
of Judiasm form the Old Testament of Christianity.

We might not be good and obedient Scientologists according
to the definitions of the Cof$ whom we are in protest against.

But the Christians are not good and obedient Jews and yet
are allowed to have their old testament regardless of any
Jewish opinion.

We ask for the same rights, namely to practice our religion
as we see fit and to have access to our holy scriptures
without fear of the Cof$ copyright terrorists.

We ask for others to help in our fight.  Even if you do
not believe in Scientology or the Scientology Tech, we hope
that you do believe in religious freedom and will choose
to aid us for that reason.

Thank You,

The FZ Bible Association

**************************************************


9TH ACC CONTENTS

December 1954 to January 1955 in Phoenix, Arizona.

Based on the solution to entrappment cassette version.

F# = File number (** = not available)
O# = Original Number (according to the master list posted by Pilot)
REN = As renumbered in the Solution to Entrappment cassettes

F# O#  REN  DATE  TITLE

01  1   1  Dec  6 Introduction to 9th ACC: Havingness
02  2   2  Dec  7 The Essence of Auditing, Know to Mystery Scale
03  3   3  Dec  8 Rundown on Six Basics
04  4   4  Dec  9 Communication Formula
05  5   5  Dec 10 The Practice of Dianetics and Scientology
06  6   6  Dec 13 Conduct of the Auditor
07  7   7  Dec 14 Mechanics of Communication
08  8   8  Dec 15 Havingness
09  9   9  Dec 16 Pan-determinism and One-way Flows
10  9A 10  Dec 17 Hist. & Dev. of Processes: Games & Limitations in Games
11  9B 10A Dec 17 History and Development of Processes: Q&A Period
12 10  11  Dec 20 Games (Fighting)
13 11  12  Dec 21 Anatomy of Games -- Part I
14 11A 12A Dec 21 Anatomy of Games -- Part II
15 12  13  Dec 22 One-way Flows in Processing
16 12A 13A Dec 22 One-way Flows in Processing: Question and Answer Period
17 13  14  Dec 23 Havingness and Communication Formulas
** 13A --  Dec 23 After Lecture Comments   
18 14  15  Dec 24 Pan-determinism
19 14A 15A Dec 24 Pan-determinism: Question and Answer Period
20 15  16  Dec 27 Training New People
** 15A --  Dec 27 Curiosa from Dianetics 55!
21 16  17  Jan  3 Auditing Requirements, Differences
22 16A 18  Jan  4 Time
** 16AA -  Jan  4 Q&A Period
23 17  19  Jan  5 Auditing at Optimum
24 18  20  Jan  6 Exteriorization
25 19  21  Jan  7 Elementary Material: Know to Mystery Scale
26 20  22  Jan 10 Education: Goals in Society -- Adult Education
27 21  23  Jan 11 Fundamentals of Auditing
** 21A --  Jan 11 Auditors' Conference
28 22  24  Jan 12 Definitions: Glossary of Terms -- Part I
29 23  25  Jan 13 Definitions: Glossary of Terms -- Part II
30 24  26  Jan 14 Definitions: Glossary of Terms -- Part III
31 25  27  Jan 17 Auditing Demonstration: Six Basics in Action
** 25A --  Jan 17 Auditors' Conference
32 26  28  Jan 18 Auditing Demonstration: Spotting Spots
** 26A --  Jan 18 Auditors' Conference
33 27  29  Jan 19 Auditing Demonstration: Exteriorization
34 28  30  Jan 20 Background Music to Living
35 29  31  Jan 21 Axioms: Laws of Consideration -- What an Axiom Is

Note that 6 of the 9 discussion periods (Q&A periods, Auditors'
Conferences, etc.) were omitted from the cassettes, leaving us
with only 35 files instead of the 41 that were recorded.  It is
also possible that material was edited out of the lectures which
are available.  If anyone has a set of the original reels, please
post any missing material.

========================

9ACC file 14/35

9th ACC 11A (12A) - ANATOMY OF GAMES, PART II

Transcript of Lecture by L. Ron Hubbard 9ACC11A - 5412C21 
Renumbered 12A for "The Solution To Entrapment"
cassettes

ANATOMY OF GAMES, PART II

A lecture given on 21 December 1954


The big lesson we learn out of all this, and which I have
diversively been trying to feed you, one way or the other,
is that a good, thorough two-way cycle of communication,
remedy of the scarcity of; will destroy any existing
barrier whether space or matter or energy or time.
Communication is the solvent of all barriers.

And where an individual has compartmented his body off and
his head is fighting his feet, or his right half is
fighting his left half as you get in a stroke, there's a
barrier existing there. You will find the barrier in the
form of a ridge - actually a piece of energy. You will find
it also in space on a compulsive exteriorization.

Any one of these things - all you have to do is get the
part that's out of communication on the other side of the
barrier into communication. Or actually just tackle the
barrier. Have the barrier start saying, "Hello, hello,
hello," and boom, where's the barrier?

Well, theoretically we as a group could probably sit right
here and reduce entirely the walls of this room by picking
them out atom by atom and making them all say hello many
times. Theoretically. But we want this room! Look what
would happen here. Immediately we'd get all the traffic
noises, wouldn't be able to contain heat in the place, et
cetera, et cetera, et cetera.

Well now, the preclear is in a state of mind where he
doesn't know where the barriers mean a game and where they
mean no game. And he's liable to pick up barriers which are
actually game barriers and destroy them which gives him
less game. And he's liable to completely ignore the unused,
unmeaningful barriers - you know the ones that are no longer
used for the game. He's liable to ignore those entirely.
Because he has neglected them, he doesn't even recognize
they're there.

By bringing the facsimile into the view of the people of
the world, by showing them there was such a thing as an
energy mass - by getting this around - we call their
attention on something they'd long since forgotten had
existed. See, existed once but they'd forgotten it and they
had no reality on it. And all of a sudden we could
demonstrate that these barriers did exist, that they could
dictate orders, that they were barriers between the
individual and the outside. And we had a method of
destroying them which was to go into communication with
them several times over. And look at the erasure of an
engram and making something say "hello" as blood brothers.
They're not even remote cousins, they're blood brothers.
Only we can do it more effectively because we know
the rest of the formula. 

Any preclear (also just a repetition here), any preclear is
somewhere on the cycle of games. I haven't been terribly
specific - saying this is point A, B, 3, 4, 5, 6, something
of this sort, of the cycle - but you can certainly look it
over, how a game has - is all communication, then it halves
up with barriers, and then it divides up with some more
barriers and divides up with some more barriers.

Actually the individuality of everybody involved in this
game - which has been the real nut to crack - they
booby-trapped it over in India. They said they had
something called nirvana. They're supposed to merge in with
the consciousness of all and all this sort of nonsense. The
funny part of it was that when you start to knock down the
barrier you lose enforced or inhibited individuation. You
do not lose real individuality. The guy becomes more
himself. He says, "I am me."

Did you ever notice a preclear who suddenly discovered
where he was? Right after he feels more like a person,
doesn't he? Feels more like an individual. Similarly, we
get somebody exteriorized so he's exteriorized with great
certainty and he knows he's there and the body's there.
When he gets over the shock of this and when he can operate
as exterior, why, he feels more as a person.

Unless, of course, you rip away all of his game barriers.
If you ripped away all of his game barriers and left him
nothing but his old, forgotten, you know, barriers that
didn't mean anything anyhow, he'd get to be an unhappy
person as far as you were concerned. He'd get real unhappy.

Okay. The amount of work which you can do on a preclear is
today very definitely lessened, but in view of the fact
that old barriers and old masses - or barriers in formation
and masses in formation and spaces which are in formation,
you might say - these too, will keep drifting through as
you're running this communication4ype processing.

So that we've set the boy all up with this particular set
of barriers and he's feeling very good, something slides or
slips and he goes into another set of barriers. And we
could conceive that this would just go on endlessly. We
could believe this would just go on endlessly, you see.
It - that would be a very disheartening thing. We face the
same thing. I found out that you could erase what appeared
to me to be a tremendous number of engrams, see. And at the
end of this time having put the person into this much
communication with the bank, probably in 1949, 1950 he was
probably sitting out in back of his head someplace. He was
out of the bank.

And then what was discouraging was to find many people
after we got going in the Foundation and so forth, we
discovered that there were more aberrated people than I had
noticed before. There were quite a few, particularly after
you've given the answers on how to be aberrated. The trick
here was that these people would erase two or three dozen
engrams you see, and you'd say, "Oh, just wonderful" - you
spent a lot of time on this by the way, you've spent maybe
a couple hundred hours erasing all these engrams, you
see - and you say, "Well, gee. We really got it now, see."
And there's another one. And there's another one. And
there's more and there's more and there's more and there's
more and there's more. See that manifestation? You know,
you experienced it. All right.

The same thing happens when you're running this
communication-type processing. You get rid of this set of
barriers, this set of aberrative factors and so forth, and
there are just some more of them. And you - let's say you're
just destroying unusable masses, in terms of the preclear,
see. And you destroy this whole set of masses and then
there're just some more of them. And then you destroy all
these and there's just some more of them. You get him into
a freer communication and there's just some more of them.
And you get him into a freer communication and there's some
more of them. That's a hell of a note. Isn't it?

Well fortunately, unlike running engrams, where we can
"stick" him every once in a while, and so forth, this
process continues to prove the - improve the individual's
identity. And it improves his ability; it gets him better
located. And the better he's located, why then, the more
powerful he dares get.

Did you ever walk through a room rapidly and expansively
which was dark and filled with bric-a-brac? Your
bric-a-brac will come down, won't it? Boy, here's a big
dark room all filled full of china and glass and so forth,
and you walk in that, you know, dark, can't see. Well, you
walk awful gentle. You're not very strong. You're not very
fast when you're doing that. All right, let's get the
lights on pretty bright. A guy could walk through there
with considerable speed. He'd dare demonstrate a little bit
of stuff. You picked up enough of the china and breakables.

Well, this process does not have the liability on test. It
doesn't have the liability of finding the person unable to
handle the next energy mass. What we make him do is handle
energy mass after energy mass after energy mass, or space,
or have him handle this or that again and again and again.
And he's improving his ability on it all the time. Because
it works so quick, he gets a better idea of his ability on
it. And he gets a better idea of his ability and a better
one and a better one and a better one. And all of a sudden,
although you may not have reduced his actual number of
barriers by one one-billionth, you have put him up the line
to a point where he's convinced of his ability to handle
these barriers. And therefore he will communicate.

He is not communicating just like you would not walk
through a dark room strewn with china with great speed.
There are consequences to communication. Strange and weird
barriers slide in. Old masses of some kind or another or
old flows start up or he gets out of time in some fashion
or another.

I just ran a - I ran a test on this which you might be
interested in. I had a fellow have the front of his face
and then the center of his head and then the back of his
head, in that order, simply say "hello." Great many curious
things showed up. You know these black masses that hang
around the optic nerves and so on - that give people eye
trouble and so on? My God, these things turned on enough to
just blowtorch him. It was all I could do for a short time
to keep him at it. His attention was so solidly fixed upon
these - of course, he was holding them there, creating
them - so fixed upon them, in any case he would have been
creating them, you see - so fixed upon them that it was hard
for him to fix at all upon the auditor. In other words, his
attention just went onto these things, spannnng. And I had
each tiny particle of this black mass tell him hello. I
finally got this through to him. Had a little struggle
there for a while. Had each tiny part of this black mass
that had shown up which underlay the optic nerves back of
the eyeball, I had each particle say hello to him.
Fascinating. Blew them after turning on a somatic enough to
knife him in half.

Well, now a few days later he had some more of these. They
showed up while he was eating dinner so he blew them. Get
the difference - difference of reaction.

He just noticed them and he said, "Hell, those don't belong
there." So he made them all say, "hello' unanimously. And
it blew. Up to that time he was so fixed upon them - . Did
you ever notice a preclear who when he tried to exteriorize
tried to take his eyes with him?

Male voice: Yeah. 

Huh? Well, that's real wild.

Well, the energy masses which are connecting quote "him" to
his eyes and so on are just masses for which he is no
longer taking any responsibility. So they can command him.
He no longer commands them.

If you were to have somebody doing that, simply have those
eye masses say "hello" you see; those masses around there
that he had felt - even if he could just feel them, you see,
somehow. Just have the area say "hello, hello, hello,
hello, hello, hello," and have him acknowledge them once in
a while. Or have them say "Okay, okay," it doesn't matter
much. You'll find that the difference of phrase will shift
once in a while as the formula - the cycle rolls through.
Why, he'll stop trying to take his eyes with him.

Actually you could say, from a standpoint of
randomity - having separated them out individually, you see,
as eyes - they are trying to be taken along. Well, now they'd
just be anxious about his - about communicating with him or
to him. That's a hell of a stuck flow, you understand,
the - this.

Many, many times he's never even said "I see it." See, his
eyes have gone around and daaa. You know. Well, just take a
sweep around the room. How much have you seen of the room
that you have actually seen of the room? I'll give you an
example of it.

Have those portions of the room now say hello. The ones you
haven't noticed, have them say hello. Well, I can tell you
for sure you haven't sat here looking at that back, green
drape. Have it say hello a few times. Got that real good?
Got that now? Okay. Now you say okay to it.

Acknowledgment of sight. What's happening as you do that?

Female voice: Perception's coming up.

Perception coming up a little bit? Now, have my back say
okay to you. All right. Now you say okay to my back. You
say okay now to the back of this chair up here. You're
merely acknowledging the fact that it is visible. You
having the back of this chair - you having - are you saying
okay to the back of this chair now? Huh? Okay. Tell me if
you feel it pull free or something. Still saying okay to
the back of this chair?

What's the matter? 

Male voice: I feel like I've overdone it. 

Why?

Male voice: Thought it was going to talk to me. 

Don't want to talk to it anymore? 

Male voice: Just wasn't. 

All right. Have it say okay to you a few times. That work? 

Male voice: Started to, and then the same trouble. I - I just 
started just alternating each time. 

Well, say hello to it. Have it originate some communications 
to you.

All right. 

All right. What happens as you do that?

Female voice: My ears started to hurt, and...

Oh, just wanted to see - did you find any space expanding?
Did you get a greater distance of space or a greater
distance involved in the thing? 

Female voice: Yeah. 

All right.

Now, let's take something that you customarily do not
notice very much, particularly in the city and so forth -
the ground. Now you say okay to the ground a few times.

All right. Let's vary it a little bit now and say okay to
the ground this way: "Okay, I know you're there."

How does that work? 

Male voice:... about a mile high and you could say there's 
so much more ground. 

Yeah.

Anybody have any wild and odd and strange visio shown up
here? 

Female voice: Thought I was a hundred feet up or
something. Then when I began to say, "Okay, I know you're
there. .." 

Hm-mm?

Female voice: . . . sometimes it was and sometimes it wasn't.

Okay. Have the ground, now, all around - I don't care where,
but just ground - say, "Okay, I know you're there" to you.
How's that? Is it working? Hmm? All right. Now have the
ground say hello. Okay. How's that going? Rough? Little
rough, hmm? Hmm?

Female voice: Monkey business. 

What's happening? 

Female voice: Well, first 1 kept moving away from it, then 
the more it said hello the closer I got back to it. 

Uh-huh. It's all right.

Has anybody recognized yet he's playing with the mechanism
known as gravity? 

Audience: Yes. 

Oh, you've recognized this?

This is gravity. It's the unacknowledged communication; the
unoriginated communication. The unacknowledged
communication will gradually pin a guy to something. This
is gravity.

Now, if we stop and think that it's actually the sun which
shows you the Earth, we see that the sun is probably making
a communication on a continuing basis. So, have the sun
say hello to you now. Whoa!

Male voice: I'd just as soon acknowledge that one right
now. 

All right. Now, in view of the fact that you've received 
a great many communications from the sun without ever 
acknowledging it, how about you just saying okay to
the sun. 

All right. Say okay to the sun some more. 

Now get - okay, now get the sun knowing you've said okay to it.
Okay. All right. How's it going? Hmm?

Female voice: I don't know exactly the way to describe it. 

Hmm.

Female voice: And uh - on that know - the sun knowing that
while I said okay, it seemed to have a greater reality than
the others. 

Mm-mm. Okay.

Anybody bogged down utterly? Now, let's do a direct
acknowledgment and find the floor. Is the floor there?

Audience: Yes. 

All right. Now, you tell the floor it's there. 

Audience: You're there. 

Tell it again.

Audience: You're there, floor. 

Tell it again.

Audience: You're there, floor. 

Tell it again.

Audience: You're there, floor. 

Okay. Is your chair there?

Audience: Yes. 

Good. How do you feel? 

Audience: Fine, good.

Feel okay?

All right. That's just an example, not run to be
therapeutic, but just to demonstrate to you some of the
oddities which result simply from running the most basic
elements of the communication formula. I dare say it could
probably produce levitation, probably produce all kinds of
strange things simply by working with this rather
conscientiously on someone. Remember that communication is
a two-way cycle; that there are two cycles involved. And as
you work with it you'll probably become conscious of the
fact that you have been ignoring one point of one of the
cycles or something of the sort.

And this, remember, is a barrier breakdown and results in
the breakdown of barriers as such so that it's not too bad
occasionally to have somebody dream up some games he can
play, or something like this, if you continue this too
long. Because what will it do? It will take all the games
away from your preclear unless you remedy this to some
degree right now.

I have given a preclear an object - most obvious processes go
along with this - I've given him an object and said, "How
many games could you play with this object?"

"Well," he'd say, "A great number."

"Well, describe one." You know, a lighter.

"Well, I could fix it up so it couldn't light. I could fix
it up so if I lit it, why, I'd light a girl's cigarette
with it and she would blow it out and then I would have to
light it again." Most elementary sort of things. And then
he'd start up into cops and robbers with this thing you
know. He could hide something very precious in it, you
know, odds and ends and so forth. And suddenly, recognize
that to some slight degree this lighter was a part of his
game environment. So here's a new word for you guys - "game
environment."

Now, there'd be a game environment and a no-game
environment. What a person objects to is what he considers
to be a no-game environment. Now, remember that a person
exteriorized with no perception of barriers and no
necessity to contact them anymore could be in a no-game
environment for his money. So you'd eventually get tired of
this after three or four days and go back in his head,
occlude it all in, lose himself thoroughly, run up into
some barriers, and disperse. Then say ah! here we are now.
Now we're in a game environment. Now, therefore barriers
could fall into these two categories: those used
immediately and actively in and usable in games; and those
which are not being used in games. See, it would not be
true to say that something was a no-game environment. This
is an impossibility. That's not an exact truth. Nothing
could be a no-game environment. But it would mean this:
That an individual wasn't playing any games with those
barriers.

Male voice: His consideration. 

Yeah, just his consideration of the barrier.

Now, we find out that the preclear gets as well as slowly
as he's unable to change his consideration about being able
to use a barrier in a game.

We find out that he moves into a new neighborhood or
something of this character and all of these barriers
around look rather alien, uninteresting and so forth,
because he has not included them under his game
environment - not until several things will occur and his
attention can be fixed on some of these things.

For instance, I had an example of this just the other day.
I hadn't considered that the activities of the caretaker
at the next door place to mine had anything to do with me.
This was brought forcefully to my attention when yesterday
he started to burn brush and I have some very dry grass in
the orchard. And he, for some reason or other, considered
it a very brilliant thing to do to light a fire immediately
opposite an enormous pile of brush which would have - if
ignited on a windy day - would have taken the rest of the
orchard and the house too. And having been dissuaded from
that, he immediately moved down the road, built another
small fire which he really didn't mean, and then moved
across the road onto my side of the road and built another
fire. It was getting to be a rather heavy game environment
as far as I was concerned - about the thing. We - you - that 
is just a kind of a goofy idea. Now I'm paying some attention
to what's going on next door, you see. That's part of the
game environment.

For instance, I hadn't paid any attention at all till - to
the - to the situation of car thefts and so forth or theft
in general as crime statistics, they were rather
uninteresting to me, till all of a sudden I get a car
stolen. Well, now this isn't vitally interesting and for
one thing the car is insured for its full worth. But this
is beside the point. I got very interested in that as a
game environment.

And although I'd been interested in criminality and
criminology for a great many years, hadn't bothered to pick
up any actual statistics for just ages. So I went and had
the statistics dug up and was properly amazed at what a
fruitful playing field that seems to be for a great many
people. And also utterly condemned, to my eye, the
ingenuity at least of his particular community and of the
United States as a whole in their handling of crime.

You mean to say that a group of people such as the people
of this particular area, who are rather noted for their
desire for space and ideas and that sort of thing, couldn't
figure out a better system to keep their cars than this?
Now, it affects every one of them. They pay the most
fantastic insurance rates in this area. It's one of the
highest insurance rate areas in the United States. And it
all stems from the fact that the granting of driver's
licenses is so badly done and the theft of cars is so high
that insurance in this area is practically prohibitive. For
a rather valuable car it'd be nothing to pay $180 for a
year's insurance policy. You know that's a lot of money.

Well, what it revolves down to is the fact that nobody is
on the ball down here at City Hall, that's all. They're
just not on the ball at all. And it immediately reflects
so that every citizen in the area has to contribute to this
game called cops and robbers, but he's not playing the game
called cops and robbers, you see. And that's what's known
as a broken piece. You know, he's contributing to a game
but he's not playing in the game in some fashion or another
Well, I want you to continue to look this over, experiment
with it, run it. If anybody starts to get upset materially
about this, remedy some havingness. But I'll show you the
other way to remedy havingness about it and this now
becomes allowable in auditing.

"Invent some games."

How many ways could you run that? You could run it, "Invent
some games with this object." You could say, "Mock up
somebody inventing some games for you."

And you'll find out that the joie de vivre of the
individual immediately picks up. What becomes curious in
processing this process is - you will discover many things
become curious - but the main thing that becomes curious - not
in processing amongst ourselves because we are interested
in this particular game and we are interested in the
phenomena and we have a slight vested interest in the - in
the state of the mind and the understanding it, but to
somebody who is merely getting processed because his
"uppigitis" bothers him or something of the sort, this is
not the case. And it'll be about all you can do to hogtie
this fellow into an auditing chair - occasionally. He will
suddenly run this process of "invent games," he will think
of a game, he will fixate on some old terminal, reactivate
it, add it up to his present time environment, and man
alive, it's about all you can do to get a lariat on this
fellow in time to keep him from going down the avenue at
120 miles an hour just to go on with the playing of this
game, you know? He gets real ecstatic and excited about
this particular game. "Boy, yah - that's - that's terrific,"
see. And he's on his way. Well, now, the awful part of it
is, is that when this turns on in the auditing room - it
will - it turns on furiously you understand; it turns on
strongly and it seems to be overweighing his better
judgment with regard to auditing. He yet can't do many
things. His sonic, his visio, his exteriorization stability
and all these things are all off. It is a manic and this
process turns on a manic in that fashion. It's very curious.

With this process you must be pitching in there because you
can turn on actively a manic state of, "I've got to get
going with this or with that," very hectic. It's almost
next door to fear when it's in its worst condition. It's
very hectic and there's nothing real bad about this except
that it'll burn out in three days.

So maybe the solution to this is just let the guy write
something down in his case history book - one reason to keep
a case history book - and put it up on the shelf and let him
go his way. And when he comes back to you in three days
complaining about how bad he feels or something of that
sort you just show him what you noted in the book. In other
words that you predicted the condition. And immediately
that makes you boss again and you would go on with the
process. I've done this with several preclears. It's very
effectual, particularly if you take down the folder from
the exact place where you put it and he saw you put it, and
show him that you wrote in it at the time that he'd be back
and see you in three days. He starts to look at you very
closely and mock up a turban around your head.

Female voice: Or a halo. 

Yes, or a halo. Well, a halo is a dispersed turban.

All right. Are there any questions about all this now?

Male voice: Yeah. Is the halo a condensed thetan? 

Ohh. Did you ever see a condensed thetan do much shining?

We're in - we're in a field at this moment that I wouldn't
breathe this out loud very far and I certainly wouldn't
teach students this - just students at random who haven't
been around at all. But evidently we are in a field, right
here, where the two things an individual does do, basic
things he does do, is go into communication with things,
make things go into communication with him, and invent
games and pay attention to other people inventing games.
So, we are almost not in the field of processing at all and
we can self-process almost any of this because it ends
itself quickly. I mean, we start self-processing it a
little bit, something like that, you notice it's a way of
handling things; a way of handling things.

You don't understand the anatomy of a motor which is lying
there so you make the motor say hello, and you acknowledge
the fact that it is lying there broken. I don't say the
motor will run, or that you will be enough of an
electrician to immediately fix it because you know
instantly what's wrong with it, but both of those things
can occur just as a result of the process. And the other
thing certainly does occur: you stop worrying about a
broken down motor. You see? Its breakdown condition is
something that you are perfectly willing to communicate
with. If you are willing to communicate with a broken down
condition of a piece of machinery - if you're willing to
communicate with it, my God, the darn thing will run
forever. It just gets into apathy about it: "There's no
effect I can produce on him."

Well, you never saw anything as insistent upon barriers
being in their exact and proper location as a motor. And of
course, you get a body being equally insistent upon this
fact that everything be in its right location. The
disturbance of many a preclear is simply just this - it's an
anchor point out of position. And he will be quite
disturbed, you know. He'll have all kinds of modus operandi
to assign to this disturbant. It worries him that a body is
slightly out of commission, you see? And the general
machine is not functioning exactly optimum. And we get it
all broken down with great labor, exteriorize this boy,
and we get him all set up and then we have him adjust this
one small anchor point which is-usually hangs below one
ear. And his headaches cease, or some damn fool thing
immediately occurs like this.

The first piece of machinery that breaks down to a thetan
who has gotten very hectic about machinery, of course, is
a body. And then you will see that break down a little bit,
and you will see bodies in the vicinity of that person
start breaking down, which is quite curious.

Did you ever notice what wonderful condition nurses were
in? What fascinating, radiantly healthy condition nurses
were in? Well, if you've never noticed this, I invite you
to go down to a hospital sometime.

Male voice: They looked healthy on the outside but inside
they're a mess, the ones I've seen. 

Female voice: Yeah.

They are so clean and polished up exteriorly that you're
not liable to notice it, but actually you, as a
Scientologist, would have your nerve with you not to notice
it. They are just busted to flinders.

The - in the navy the officers in far stations, and so on,
quite commonly date nurses who are officers and as
practically the only social, between the sexes, contact
available anywhere around, you know. And you'd say that
women getting all this attention from all these men would
be not bad at all, you know? They're treated very nicely
and so forth, and yet a check-over of the number of nurses
available for a dance or something like that always finds
several of them, you see, completely out of commission and
out of the running. They have there - they have a cold or
they're upset this way or that way. What's fabulous is that
they don't come down with, as often, with the diseases of
their patients. They can't duplicate that well, I guess.

Male voice: Schoolteachers too. Schoolteachers have a rough
time with this, yea.

Male voice: Ron, you said Something - somebody's incapable
partner? say hello to him and so forth. Hmm.

Male voice: What good does it do to validate a physical 
incapacity?

Nothing. The power - the process - communication itself-
let me put it this way, is so powerful that it overcomes
the manifestation of validation. It is - it's one of these
things that is present, but it becomes a lesser factor. A
commun - a barrier, remember, is an artificiality - a very
nebulous thing. A barrier is a hard thing to keep there. It
blows fast if you start working on it.

Male voice: The other day I was working on Mrs. Bloom, she
had the bum foot, you know, minus graph. She had the bum
foot. Well, I just had the foot say hello to her and the
swelling - when I first walked there the foot was like a
balloon. If you touched it it would have blown to pieces.
And the swelling went down and she could start moving it.
And she first of all wouldn't say anything happened, and
then I touched her foot where it hurt, and it didn't hurt
there no more, and I touched her foot where it hurt again
and it didn't hurt there, didn't hurt anywhere.

Yea. They will start in originally - if you do not direct
them - they will start in by having the pain itself, and
the area of the pain itself say hello. Your auditing
command was simply "Have the foot say hello" and they will
first start in with the pain saying hello, the ridge saying
hello, the absent parts, the missing sensation parts saying
hello, and they'll sort all this out. And they'll finally,
really, eventually start answering your auditing command.
It is a total comm lag. And you must regard it as a total
comm lag. The fellow has spent twelve hours in the auditing
chair having his poliomyelitis results on his leg say
hello, you see. Just told him to have his leg say hello.
And he will just suddenly have his leg start saying hello.
But this is the first time he obeyed the auditing command,
which is - we see, communication lag in action right there.
We just watch communication lag taking place. The fellow
did not have his leg say hello, he had a ridge, a tendon, a
joint, something like this, say hello.

Male voice: The enforced communication part is usually the
first thing he contacts. In other words, the hypersensitive
area.

That's right. Of course, I have found out that what worries
a person, seemingly, in its acute state, naturally, is
pain - the enforced communication part. That seems to be. But
they rapidly then start communicating with areas which have
no sensation in them. And this seems to worry them much
more, really, than just a constant ache or something like
that. An ache or a pain if severe will of course attract
their attention.

But as people walk along the street the thing that they are
worried about - you know, they're not in acute pain - the thing
that they're worried about is the fact that they don't have
any sensation in their feet. And maybe it's so far out of
reality that they don't even know they're worried about it
and don't even know they have no sensation in their feet.

And as with running this process on test, I've had more
persons suddenly say, "You know, I had no sensation of any
kind in my stomach? Whew!"

See, it was a big relief; you know? Just they all of a
sudden - we got that factor into reality. We haven't done a
thing about it. He's just noticed the condition. And yet
the big relief on it. And then finally we have his stomach
say hello and we acknowledge his stomach, and we do other
things with his stomach. All of a sudden we get pains and
aches and ridges shoot this way and that. Things are
starting to come apart at the seams. He will be making the
particles there say hello, not his stomach. He'll
eventually get to a point where he'll have his stomach
saying hello. And at this time, why, everything is fine.
Everything's pretty smooth.

Male voice: What is this manifestation that you run into so
often doing this, where... body say hello to.

Or very sympathetic or very, very compassionate toward life
at large. Or the rest of them.

Female voice: Ron, you said that this might turn on a manic
and somebody might want to go rushing off

Oh, yes.

Female voice: Well, I happen to know two people who go
doing this all the time. They spend all their time mocking
up games for other people to do or that they can't do. And
they never actually play them. And both of them are very
nice. And yet both of them have lots of wonderful ideas.

Well, you've just got a detached sort of an observer sort
of a nonparticipation factor involved here. Such people
could be at two different positions on the Tone Scale.
Actually that is the condition of some of the players, as
we use the word technically (a player: somebody who is
monitoring some section of this universe, sending people
back through between-lives areas and so forth), this might
be his attitude too. But the - this is - this is again a case
of aberrated truth, you see. Now, of course - let's define
this manic. It's - in both of these people it's merely an
aberrated truth.

Female voice: Yeah. All right.

Female voice: This man is what they used to label an
entrepreneur, you know, he goes to do something. 

Yeah.

Female voice: Well, now he don't do them. He just...

That's right. They get down, and they think of these
wonderful things to do like the Bandar-log of Kipling. You
know, here we go in with the ... 

Female voice: And he just goes around all day and all night... 

Hmm-hm.

Female voice:... all year. I've known him. for three years
now. I've never known what to do about it, so I've let him
alone.

Stuck action. He has not walked into another entrepreneur
who got things done. You get the idea. He just got - he is
the entrepreneur. He eventually backs out totally into an
idea stage. Or you'll find a writer finally sitting around
talking about the wonderful stories he might write. And
then after a while he won't even talk about them anymore.
And that's what will happen to this individual. He
eventually will not talk about even the idea anymore. He'll
just back on off of this game entirely.

The thing to do is to, well, have him mock up somebody
else... What was this fellow doing, stage work?

Female voice: No. He - he invented services.

Good. Have somebody else inventing services and you'll find
out that in his life he has been so mad at other people who
invented services. And have him mock up other people
inventing services and inventing things for him to do and
so on. And the next thing you know, why, he will pull out
of it and without becoming hectic about it simply get
active again, hardly noticing that he has been inactive
which is the curious "no pay" for the auditor.

Remember when we say manic we mean this very strongly.
Because a person is active, because they're in action we do
not mean he's on a manic. This is a - this is a word which
simply means an other-determined course which is going to
flub out. The usual course of flub out, when it's turned on
in auditing, is three days. The usual course in life itself
is three or four years. The person will get on a manic of
doing something, he'll be terrifically active, very hectic
about this, and then all of a sudden it'll ease on out of
existence. And he won't have any communication on that line.

Well, he never determined to do it in the first place. All
he was doing was dramatizing. So drama - a manic would mean
dramatized action.

Female voice: But he did used to do it. Mmm.

Well, okay. Now, if we're going to get real acquainted with
this communication formula, why, there's various things
that you will simply have to do with it in order to get
thoroughly acquainted with it. Because it's all very well
for me to sit here and talk to you and so forth, and
describe a lot of things and so on, but there's nothing
quite as real as reality.

Now, if we could find some possession which an individual
is holding on to very dearly - I mean this amongst you, see.
This is auditing toward significances and specifics. We
don't care if you do that. I mean, so what. I mean, it's a
waste of time to a large degree with a - with a preclear.
But always to some slight degree an auditor is doing this.
And so if we were to find something that somebody was
holding onto - he didn't quite know why the hell he was
holding on to it - and then we work, on a two-way cycle of
communication, various mock-ups of remedying communication
angles to it. Just as a little exercise or an experiment,
you will discover one of the more interesting series of
rationalities, the reasons why, see, the tremendous number
of reasons why he's holding on to this and the tremendous
number of reasons why he started to originally. And we will
finally come out into the clean about it. And he will,
actually, whether you told him or I told him or not, will
suddenly recognize just lack of acknowledgment or lack of
answer or lack of originated communication, you see.

Now, as far as barriers are concerned, remember we had said
something about admiration. We said that which is not
admired persists. Huh? Well, that which is not communicated
with on a two-way cycle persists.

Now, we had said some thing, we meant some thing. Actually,
a person or a life unit communicated with on a two-way
cycle of communication gets even more alive and more alert.
But this does not work with MEST objects. They go to
pieces. Barriers go to pieces. Now, I haven't made any real
test of space. The anchor points of this universe are
something I've been saving.

Okay.

Now, I've held you way over. It's ten minutes of three. My God.

Let's utilize, now, in the auditing, just to go over it
again, any part of this communication formula on any
object. And remember this one, and let's cut loose on this
one now, of the invention of games. Let's discuss what
you're doing with this and so forth.

Female voice: That's for today? 

That's for today and until further assignment is given.

Okay.

(end of lecture)




